Policy Positions

June 29, 2020

Statement from Campaign for Accountability on Supreme Court’s June Medical Services v. Russo Decision

“Today the Supreme Court appropriately applied its prior precedent guaranteeing the right to access abortion care,” said Alice Huling, Counsel at Campaign for Accountability.

“Despite the Court’s identical prior precedent, the Court’s plurality decision lacks a clear majority opinion, and leaves the door open for future challenges to abortion access. Abortion opponents will continue to pursue TRAP laws aimed at curtailing and denying abortion. These laws particularly burden abortion access for marginalized populations, rural communities, and young people and as long as they are being enacted the fight to protect reproductive rights is far from over.”

January 13, 2020

Coalition Letter to White House and Senate on FEC Reform

On January 13, 2020, CfA joined a coalition of 21 organizations and individuals, led by Campaign Legal Center, calling for the restoration of a voting quorum at the Federal Election Commission to protect the transparency and fairness of our elections.

October 15, 2019

Letters in Support of the Congressional Budget Justification Transparency Act of 2019

On October 15, 2019, CfA and 22 other organizations wrote to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs to express support for the Congressional Budget Justification Transparency Act of 2019. Additionally, on October 30, 2019, CfA and 27 other organizations wrote to the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform to express support for the Congressional Budget Justification Transparency Act of 2019.

September 19, 2019

Letter Supporting the Open and Responsive Government Act (S. 2220)

On September 19, 2019, CfA joined 34 other organizations in endorsing the Open and Responsive Government Act (S. 2220), which would codify the primary holding of Nat’l Parks & Conservation Ass’n v. Morton that commercial information is exempt as “confidential” under FOIA's exemption 4 only if disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the person from whom the information was obtained.

Get the latest news and actions

Sign up for updates